The proposal set

CLAIM · SPEC §3.3 What it does — and, as importantly, what it does not do. Post-quantum signatures were stripped and deferred; a reader who assumes otherwise has misunderstood the proposal. Every status claim carries its version and date, because this one is still moving. Source: —— · Dated: ————-——-—— · Review due: ————-——-——

CLAIM · SPEC §3.3 Migration and legacy signature sunset, phase by phase. This is the freeze proposal and it is genuinely contested. Source: —— · Dated: ————-——-—— · Review due: ————-——-——

CLAIM · SPEC §3.3 Keep Taproot and add a hidden post-quantum fallback path rather than a new output type. What it trades away. Source: —— · Dated: ————-——-—— · Review due: ————-——-——

PROSE · SPEC §3.3, §11 Framing only. There is no neutral option here, only a choice about who ends up with the coins, and the page's job is to make that structure visible. Source: —— · Dated: ————-——-—— · Review due: ————-——-——

ARGUMENT · SPEC §3.3 Stated at full strength, in its own advocates' terms. Source: —— · Dated: ————-——-—— · Review due: ————-——-——

ARGUMENT · SPEC §3.3 Stated at full strength, in its own advocates' terms, and at the same length as the case above. Asymmetry of length is adjudication by other means. Source: —— · Dated: ————-——-—— · Review due: ————-——-——

TABLE · SPEC §5 Proposal, status, last change, source. Checked weekly against the BIP repository. The chip contract applies: this table carries an AS OF and a SOURCE. Source: —— · Dated: ————-——-—— · Review due: ————-——-——